Cutter Incident Resurfaces – Misusing a Historic Tragedy

Polio Pulse

Polio Pulse provides social listening insights to support GPEI’s polio interventions on disinformation, crisis communication, and strategic communication. Data is monitored from polio-endemic and outbreak countries and geographies classified by GPEI, covering 12 major languages spoken in these regions. The platform is managed by the UNICEF Digital Community Engagement (DCE) team.

Medium Risk

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Cutter Incident Resurfaces – Misusing a Historic Tragedy

Geography

Global

Themes

Safety and side effects

Analysis

A viral X/Twitter thread by Dr. Suzanne Humphries recasts the 1955 Cutter Incident—where one manufacturer’s tainted Salk vaccine caused thousands of polio cases—into a broader conspiracy. The thread asserts that multiple companies knowingly released live-virus vaccines and scapegoated Cutter because it lacked political influence. Instagram and Facebook reels amplify this by dramatising the government’s “rush” and showing children paralysed, implying that past errors mean today’s vaccines are unsafe. Experts note that the Cutter Incident was a tragic manufacturing lapse that spurred sweeping regulatory reforms and improved oversight.

Recommendations

Acknowledge the tragedy honestly, but emphasize how it catalyzed modern safety protocols and that today’s IPV is rigorously tested and monitored.Point out that global polio cases have fallen by over 99 % since 1988 thanks to vaccination, and highlight the long track record of safe polio immunization.

← Back to Polio Pulse list

Alert Categories

◉ High risk

Narratives with widespread circulation across communities or countries, high engagement, exponential velocity, and a high potential to impact vaccination efforts.

◉ Medium risk

Narratives circulating in priority countries that may impact vaccination decisions. Potential for further spread due to the tactics used or because of predicted velocity. May highlight legitimate questions and concerns, not just false claims.

◉ Low risk

Narratives that are limited in reach, aren't impacting priority communities, or lack the qualities necessary for future spread. Helpful to know because these narratives may indicate information gaps, confusion, or concerns.